Democratic Socialist Movement (DSM)

For struggle, Solidarity and Socialism in Nigeria

Committee for a Workers' International logo

Committee for a Workers' International


Join DSM
Contact DSM
About us
Our Manifesto

Socialist Democracy

Newspaper of the DSM

Trade Unions



Socialist Democracy May Day 2005



undemocratic and Anti-Labour - DSM


On 30th March 2005, President Obasanjo signed into law an anti-labour and anti-people Trade Union (Amendment) Act targeted at taking away from the poor working masses their rights to protest and strike against his regime, anti-poor policies. The Democratic Socialist Movement (DSM) issued a statement on April 12 against the said law. Below is an excerpt of the DSM statement on the Act:



If there is still any doubt on the anti-people intention of the Obasanjo government in the pursuit of neo-liberal policies or its disrespect for democratic rights of workers, the new trade union law just promulgated should have removed it. The law is undemocratic, anti-worker, anti-people, vindictive and draconian. We of the Democratic Socialist Movement (DSM) condemn the reprehensible law and call on the all the labour centres, NLC, TUC and CFTU to set up processes and actions to defeat this anti-worker, anti-people law.


The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) should resume the campaign it commenced when the bill was before the National Assembly and later suspended out of illusion in the legislatures.


This year May Day should be dedicated to the struggle against this anti-people�s law along other attacks on the workers� interests. Adams Oshiohmole leadership of labour must not insult the intelligence of Nigerian workers by inviting Obasanjo to the Workers� Day as usually done, as Obasanjo�s hatred for workers� interests knows no bound.




Among the vexatious areas of the law is the fascist provision that makes it illegal for workers in the so-called essential services which include education, health, electricity, air traffic control and aviation, communication and water services, to go on strike. It is not only ironical but also shamelessly hypocritical that the government that does not deem health and education sectors, for instance, so essential to deserve adequate funding, could come around to see them as such while it is determined to use an undemocratic law to quell workers� inevitable resistance to the crisis arising from its counter-productive policies.


Another obnoxious provision of the law is the one that outlaws embarking on industrial actions by the labour in protest against anti-people policies of the government like perennial increase in the pump price of the petroleum products.


The foregoing cited provisions are not only draconian but also blatantly unconstitutional. It sharply runs contrary to the spirits of the section 40 of the Nigerian Constitution which stipulates rights to freedom of association. While the trade union law pretends to recognise the freedom of association, it defeats the essence of existence of such association which is the protection of the workers� interests. The law outrightly denies workers in the so-called essential services enjoyment of this fundamental right. While it creates impression that the interests of workers are limited mechanically to the issues pertaining to their condition of services. But the fact is that workers are not isolated from the entire society, like every citizen any policy of the government is of interest to the worker. Therefore, if such policy is against general interest for decent living, the workers have right to protest.




The essence of the law is to clip the wing of the labour that has been providing leadership for the working masses in their opposition against the characteristic anti-people policies of Obasanjo government euphemistically called economic reforms, especially the incessant increase in fuel prices. It is on record that the labour has led five popular nationwide strikes and protests in the life of Obasanjo administration against hike in fuel price. It would be recalled that the government rushed to the National Assembly with the vindictive trade union bill shortly after one of such general strikes and protests in June 2004.

If the government thinks that with this anti-people law it has secured field day to unleash neo-liberal attacks on the people, it will be seriously disappointed. Any legislation meant to perpetually subject working people to abject suffering, more so, in the midst of abundance as obtains in Nigeria, will be naturally resisted sooner than may be imagined.




We call on the labour and masses to reject this anti-worker, anti-people law. The labour leadership must not allow itself to be held down by the obnoxious law made by outrightly corrupt politicians who revel in treasury looting and election riggings, when and where the need arises to provide leadership for the masses in protest against any form of IMF/World Bank inspired anti-people neo-liberal policies.


We are of categorical position that there are two major lessons the labour leadership should learn from the spirits and letters of the law. First, while the labour leadership has always tried to help save the face of Obasanjo�s government at the peak of masses� anger, the same government has stopped at nothing in the attempt to emasculate and cripple the labour movement. Second, the government, with the support of all the major pro-capitalist parties, is hell bent in implementing neo-liberal policies of privatisation, deregulation, downsizing, increases in fuel price and prepared to crush anybody or group that stands its way.


We therefore call on labour leadership to convene the conference of workers, civil society groups, pro-labour activists and working people organisations with a view of forming a genuine working people party as the political platform to wrestle power from the anti-people, corrupt governments at all levels. The massive support the labour always enjoys from the masses whenever it calls for action, if well harnessed, is an indication of the good prospect of the labour led party at the polls. Moreover, it will be extremely difficult to rig out such a party rested on the masses in election without a popular revolt.



Socialist Democracy May Day 2005